<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Dov Charney &amp; American Apparel lash out&#8230;again</title>
	<atom:link href="http://civilbranding.com/2010/05/amercian-apparel-brand-strategy-fuck-the-brands/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://civilbranding.com/2010/05/amercian-apparel-brand-strategy-fuck-the-brands/</link>
	<description>Building a better society through branding</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Wed, 28 Jul 2010 14:56:52 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.9.1</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: Uri B.</title>
		<link>http://civilbranding.com/2010/05/amercian-apparel-brand-strategy-fuck-the-brands/comment-page-1/#comment-13314</link>
		<dc:creator>Uri B.</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 20 May 2010 08:52:54 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://civilbranding.com/?p=1783#comment-13314</guid>
		<description>Being socially progressive and sexually permissive are two things that go together well. They have historically gone hand in hand in America - Jazz, Rock n&#039; Roll, 60&#039;s... And they  are especially relevant for this brand&#039;s target audience, and the &quot;conceptual audience&quot; in that part of the US.

So, not necessarily two separate sides of the brand.

Time is running out for low-cost textile based fashion brands, and this move is another event accelerating change. It&#039;ll be a shame is industry leaders use their brands just as sock-puppet-distraction vehicles.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Being socially progressive and sexually permissive are two things that go together well. They have historically gone hand in hand in America &#8211; Jazz, Rock n&#8217; Roll, 60&#8217;s&#8230; And they  are especially relevant for this brand&#8217;s target audience, and the &#8220;conceptual audience&#8221; in that part of the US.</p>
<p>So, not necessarily two separate sides of the brand.</p>
<p>Time is running out for low-cost textile based fashion brands, and this move is another event accelerating change. It&#8217;ll be a shame is industry leaders use their brands just as sock-puppet-distraction vehicles.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

